• Українська
  • English

<Prev | >

Current issue   Ukr. J. Phys. 2016, Vol. 61, N 7, p.565-571
http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ujpe61.07.0565    Paper

Abrosimov V.I., Davidovskaya O.I.

Institute for Nuclear Research, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
(47, Prosp. Nauky, Kyiv 03680, Ukraine; e-mail: abrosim@kinr.kiev.ua)

Residual Interaction Effect on Isoscalar Dipole Modes in Heavy Nuclei

Section: Nuclei and Nuclear Reactions
Original Author's Text: Ukrainian

Abstract: Isoscalar collective dipole excitations in heavy nuclei have been studied in the framework of the kinetic model for small vibrations in a finite Fermi system with a moving surface. An analytical expression for the second-order isoscalar response function of the dipole moment is obtained taking the residual interaction between nucleons into account in the separable approximation. It is shown that the inclusion of the residual interaction does not violate the translation invariance of the model. The strength function has a two-resonance structure, like in the zeroth-order approximation (i.e. neglecting the residual interaction). The account for the isoscalar dipole residual interaction decreases the compressibility of a system and shifts the resonances toward low frequencies, which improves the agreement with experimental data for both low- and highenergy isoscalar dipole modes in heavy nuclei.

Key words: Vlasov kinetic equation, isoscalar dipole modes, residual interaction, strength function.


  1. A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol. 2: Nuclear Deformations (Benjamin, New York, 1975).
  2. H.L. Clark,Y.-W. Lui, and D.H. Youngblood, Phys. Rev. C 63, 031301 (2001).  CrossRef
  3. D.H. Youngblood et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 034315 (2004).   CrossRef
  4. M. Uchida et al., Phys. Lett. B 557, 12 (2003).  CrossRef
  5. M. Uchida et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 051301(R) (2004).
  6. N. Van Giai and H. Sagawa, Nucl. Phys. A 371, 1 (1981).   CrossRef
  7. G. Colo, N. Van Giai, P.F. Bortignon, and M.R. Quaglia, Phys. Lett. B 485, 362 (2000).   CrossRef
  8. M.L. Gorelik and M.H. Urin, Phys. Rev. C 64, 044310 (2001).   CrossRef
  9. S. Shlomo and A.I. Sanzhur, Phys. Rev. C 65, 047301 (2002).   CrossRef
  10. J. Kvasil, N. Lo Iudice, Ch. Stoyanov, and P. Alexa, J. Phys. G 29, 753 (2003).   CrossRef
  11. J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C 62, 051304(R) (2000).
  12. D. Vretenar, A. Wandelt, and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 487, 334 (2000).   CrossRef
  13. E.N. Balbutsev and I.N. Mikhailov, J. Phys. G 14, 545 (1989);   CrossRef
  14. E.B. Balbutsev, I.V. Molodtsova, and A.V. Unzhakova, Europhys. Lett. 26, 499 (1994).   CrossRef
  15. V.M. Kolomietz and S. Shlomo, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064302 (2000).   CrossRef
  16. V.I. Abrosimov, A. Dellafiore, and F. Matera, Nucl. Phys. A 697, 748 (2002).   CrossRef
  17. M. Urban, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034322 (2012).  CrossRef
  18. D. Vretenar, N. Paar, P. Ring, and T. Niksic, Phys. Rev. C 65, 021301(R) (2002).
  19. V.I. Abrosimov, A. Dellafiore, and F. Matera, in Abstracts of the International Conference on Collective Motion in Nuclei under Extreme Condition (Paris, 2003), p. 54.
  20. A. Repko, P.-G. Reinhard, V.O. Nesterenko, and J. Kvasil, Phys. Rev. C 87, 024305 (2013).   CrossRef
  21. P.-G. Reinhard, V.O. Nesterenko, A. Repko, and J. Kvasil, Phys. Rev. C 89, 024321 (2014).   CrossRef
  22. V.I. Abrosimov, A. Dellafiore, and F. Matera, Phys. Part. Nucl. 36, 699 (2005).
  23. E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevsky, Physical Kinetics (Pergamon Press, London, 1979).
  24. B.K. Jennings and A.D. Jackson, Phys. Rep. 66, 141 (1980).   CrossRef
  25. E. Lipparini and S. Stringari, Phys. Rep. 175, 103 (1989).   CrossRef